Aquifer Exemption & the Safe Drinking Water Act
Letter from 1985 Spares about 100 Wells from Shutdown
(John COX, Bakersfield Californian; August 4, 2014)
http://www.bakersfieldcalifornian.com/business/kern-gusher/x603939181/Letter-from-1985-spares-about-100-wells-from-shutdown
(John COX, Bakersfield Californian; August 4, 2014)
http://www.bakersfieldcalifornian.com/business/kern-gusher/x603939181/Letter-from-1985-spares-about-100-wells-from-shutdown
California Oil Regulators Add 95 Wells to Review
(John COX, Bakersfield Californian; July 12, 2014)
(John COX, Bakersfield Californian; July 12, 2014)
N. B.: Aforementioned article posted on Eaglefordtexas.com by Shane THIELGES
I believe that the statement found on page 2 in the following letter written by Eric JANTZ, Staff Attorney regarding The Safe Drinking Water Act and Energy and Mineral Resource Development says it quite eloquently:
"Nevertheless, Congress did not intend to make protection of water sources secondary to mineral development."
Aquifer Exemption Letter to U. S. EPA Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6 on Behalf of the Eastern Diné Navajo Against Uranium Mining (ENDAUM) [Eric JANTZ, New Mexico Environmental Law Center; August 6, 2012]
United States Code, Title 42, Chapter 6A, Subchapter XII, Part C, §300h
N. B.: Please note 42 USC §300h(b)(1) (A - D), and §300h(b)(3)(C).
Comments
Post a Comment